MySouthEnd.com

 
SEARCH: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 8:37:11 EST Contact Us | Find Print Edition  



«HOME

NEWS

ARTS

COLUMNS
Boston and Beyond
City Streets
Dog Lady
In Business
Neighborhood News
Non Profit Sector
Police Beat
Political Notes
South End Baseball
Youth Voices

OPINION
Editorial
Letters

COMMUNITY
Calendar

ADVERTISING
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Place an Ad

ABOUT US
History
Masthead
Internships
Contact us

LINKS
Community Guide
City of Boston
Trash Collection
Elected Officials
Public Library
Bay Windows




Back to: Letters » Opinion » Home
Opinion :: Letters

Email Print DIGG this Del.icio.us

   
Letter to the Editor: UPNA responds
Wednesday Sep 3, 2008

To the editor:

This letter is intended to clarify misunderstandings regarding the Pine Street Inn’s proposal to develop a large complex on Upton Street. As indicated below, our neighborhood is utterly exasperated with Pine Street’s negotiating tactics. 

First, Pine Street presented its plan to the neighborhood in June 2007. More than 100 neighbors appeared at the meeting to hear the plan for a 15,000-square-foot 30-something ("30 to 40") single room occupancy complex. Based on the feedback of the neighbors, Pine Street said that it would come back with a smaller plan. It did not. And it continues to refuse to make a complex smaller in size than its original three building "30-something" single room occupancy plan.

A meeting between some neighbors and Pine Street took place in February of 2008. It was at this meeting that Pine Street made clear that any criticism of the plan would be met with anti-homeless claims against the neighborhood. Soon after the meeting, Pine Street embarked on a campaign to circumvent neighborhood involvement in its proposed development through the creation of a group to "welcome itself" to the neighborhood, production of buttons and newspaper advertisements critical of the neighborhood. Pine Street also recruited individuals to contact newspapers and politicians and advocate that Pine Street should have the right to develop whatever it wants, wherever it wants, with no neighborhood input.

The Pine Street position that the neighborhood finds most disconcerting is that it need not address any concerns of the neighborhood since it has the support of City Hall. Such a position flies in the face of the reason neighborhood associations are created and supported by mayors of Boston. 

Neighborhoods are the eyes and ears of the city. And just as a neighborhood provides information to the city, it acts as a conduit for information, the city needs to provide to its citizens. Neighborhoods are partners in the battles against crime and trash, as well as crucial pillars in the attempt to improve our city’s schools. It is both understandable and typical for neighborhood associations to be consulted before major decisions are made by the city or developers such as Pine Street that have an extraordinary effect on small streets. But that did not happen in this case.

Recently, because of concerns about divisive discourse in the press, both sides agreed to keep Pine Street’s revised plan and the discussions regarding it confidential. But just two days later, Pine Street was touting its plan to a group outside the neighborhood and the South End News.

Communication challenges did not end there. More recently, Pine Street and Hope House (the current landowners) scheduled a hearing before the Boston Licensing Board to receive approval to operate three buildings on Upton Street as rooming houses. This happened after Pine Street wrongly insisted that no approvals were necessary to operate its complex. Even more insulting to the neighborhood, Pine Street only notified its supporters, primarily outside the neighborhood, about the hearing. 

Finally, Pine Street justifies its dismissal of neighborhood concerns with the statement: "We have answered the neighborhood’s questions." Our neighborhood asked Pine Street to consider reducing the size of its complex and increasing proposed supervision. Yes, Pine Street answered that question - with a resounding NO!

At this point, Pine Street refuses to discuss the proposed complex with the neighborhood. Only City Hall can stand in the way of Pine Street’s campaign to shame the neighborhood into submission. This neighborhood remains resolute that Pine Street’s solutions for the homeless work for neighborhoods such as ours. And this neighborhood will not forget the divisive actions that brought us to this point.

Union Park Neighborhood Association
Jerry Frank, President

James Alan Fox, Vice President

Mary Bottella Knickle, Treasurer

Leslie Frank, Secretary

David Bonilla

Kevin Cole

Don Fleming

Sue Ann Fox

Jim Hammelberg

H. Norman Knickle

Chris Mastrangelo

Erica Mastrangelo

Bill McIntosh

Beverly Sky

Bob Williams


Editor’s note: The South End News initially learned of the Pine Street Inn’s revised proposal about a week after it was offered to the Union Park Neighborhood Association representatives, from an email sent to the members of the Welcoming Committee. We then confirmed that information with the Pine Street Inn.

Email Print DIGG this Del.icio.us

   

Back to: Letters » Opinion » Home




Most Popular This Week


1.
UPDATE: Suspect arraigned in Columbus Ave. gay bashing
2.
Developers clean up Columbus Center construction
3.
# 1 with a bullet
4.
All one ’hood at Blackstone
5.
Letters to the Editor: More on Upton Street




Upcoming Events






Quick Poll






Columns


Boston and Beyond
Just thank Paul Gunter the next time you fill up

City Streets
Why I’m not supporting Dianne Wilkerson this time

Dog Lady
My dog poops rocks

In Business
South End chef creates recipe for singles nationwide

Neighborhood News
South End wins big in Small Changes grants

Non Profit Sector
Young South Ender wins drama award

Police Beat
Handicap no handicap

Political Notes
Trouble for DiMasi; Wilkerson files signatures

South End Baseball
Youth Voices
Can’t hold me down











Copyright © 2008 South End News Inc.